An abusive, mentally unstable progressive atheist who was court-martialed for beating his wife and cracking his infant child’s skull, murders a bunch of unarmed conservative Christians in cold blood, and the Democrats want to blame….Republicans. For not passing stricter gun control laws. And, oh by the way, if the EXISTING gun laws had been properly enforced, they would have prevented the shooter from purchasing the rifle. As if obeying the law was really all that high on the list for a serial wife-beater and child abuser who had already decided in his heart to find a way to kill a whole bunch of people.
Why isn’t this shooting in a Texas church being branded a hate crime? Is it only possible to commit a “hate crime” against people who aren’t white, or Christian? If a white guy walked into a Mosque and mowed down Muslim families in job lots, oh lord the collective societal outrage! Cries for tolerance, admonitions against reprisals, calls to take a deeper look at how Muslims and Islam are perceived in our society.
It happens to a room full of Christians and the primary response is…more gun control??? Never mind the fact that the guy who stopped the shooter used one of those nasty, black “assault rifles” to do it. One which he legally owned and was trained to use. Hmmm….
Dylann Roof killed nine black people in a church, and we were awash in analysis of his racist ideology, with panel discussions and editorials and “in-depth looks” about his motivations, the roots of his hatred, and his links to white supremacist organizations.
Nobody seems to want to talk all that much about the spiritual and political ideology of this particular shooter, or what led him to target a room full of Christian families as his victims. Instead it’s the all-too-predictably shocked refrain of, “Do you know how many GUNS there are in America??!!?!”
Would this massacre have been less or more horrendous or “problematic” if it had been a Muslim suicide bomber using C4 instead of a white guy using 5.56? The media mouthpieces always want to talk about the killer’s ideology, until it doesn’t fit The Narrative, and then it’s all about the weapon used. Or what social injustice “drove” him to do it.
Blaming these deaths on a gun is a cheap, theatrical, and disingenuous cop-out. It’s an easy distraction from looking at the much more serious issue of what this psychopath believed that led him to target the people he did.
Because you just KNOW that if it had been a fringe “Christian” wacko shooting up an abortion clinic, that’s all anyone would be talking about.
I predicted this a while ago. Wish I could find the link. First it would be for pets, and then for prisoners and Alzheimer’s patients, then the military and high-risk Executives and VIPs. And all too soon, it would be Joe Average, all under the umbrella of safety, or security, or efficiency, or convenience. And here it all is.
You can discount the Christian end-times prophecies as a bunch of mystic hooey and conspiracy theories, but they very clearly foretell a day when no one will be able to buy or sell without a unique (digital?) identifier.
It’s called boiling the frog slowly. Incremental implementation until their use is so ubiquitous, so commonplace, that to try and oppose or resist makes you a fringe crackpot. Perhaps even a subversive or an “extremist.” An anti-government kook. Terms already being used to try and disparage and delegitimize groups like the Tea Party activists.
It’s all very convenient. What amazing, space-age technology! Your car will only unlock or start if it “senses” your unique digital signature. Your ATM will only dispense money to your unique digital signal. Your office can sense your arrival, and use preset light and heat settings based on your pre-programmed preferences. Who wouldn’t want that?!
Until one day, it’s decided that biometric passports aren’t enough. That perhaps the threat of domestic terrorism is so great that we “need” to be able to track citizens in real time. Britain is already awash in CCTV monitors, and is leading the way in chipping everything from pets to garbage cans to people. With an RFID implant they can track where you got on the train, when, and with who. What you bought at the store, how much gas you used last week, and where you stop for coffee on the way to work.
These chips might be able to make us more secure, more safe, more efficient. However, that security will come with a heavy price in lost personal freedoms. And if, one day, it comes about that not getting chipped gets you fined or arrested? If you can’t buy food or gas without one? Somehow, “I told you so” just won’t seem like enough.
You scoff. “Wingnut,” you snort.
How about: A National Health Care database. VeriChip implants which tie your unique biological “signature” into that database. You are required by law to have insurance. Fined if you don’t. Imprisoned if you don’t pay your fines. All of this is on the table TODAY in the some form in the Health Care bills being debated in Congress. All for our own good, don’t you know?
“and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or thenumber of his name.” (Rev 13:17, NASB)
What does it mean by the “number” of his name? See bolded items below. Eerily similar language to something written nearly 2,000 years ago. Is it really such a stretch?
An US company is considering producing electronic implants that could be used to keep tabs on kidnap victims via satellite. riginally Applied Digital Solutions had intended to market its VeriChip to patients who wanted to keep their medical records under their skin. But recently the firm has caved in to pressure to include tracking devices.
But some may see tracker chips as a positive development. After 11 September, many western governments have become paranoid about security and want to keep a closer eye on citizens with schemes such as national ID cards. “You can’t get a better ID card than one you can put under your skin,” points out Mr Pearson. The technology necessary to locate a person geographically is not particularly sophisticated. It has been around for years in the chips that are implanted beneath the skin of pets.
“Under the scheme a microchip the size of a grain of rice is injected under the skin of the dog between its shoulder blades. The chip contains a unique code number, the dog’s name, age, breed and health as well as the owner’s name, address and phone number. When the chip is “read” by a handheld scanner the code number is revealed and the details can be checked on a national database.
“Under the potentially controversial plan still taking shape in the Senate, all legal U.S. workers, including citizens and immigrants, would be issued an ID card with embedded information, such as fingerprints, to tie the card to the worker.”
“The bill in question is an amendment to the state’s Consumer Protection Act (RSA 358-A). If passed, it would require that all consumer goods or identification documents (such as driver’s licenses, credit cards or library cards) with an embedded “tracking device” to be labeled with a “universally accepted symbol” to denote the inclusion of the device.”
“Biometrics has been used previously to track the movement of staff, visitors, and prisoners in and out of correctional facilities. It has also been used to account for staff members in the event of a riot or other prison disturbance. This project represents the first use of biometrics to track prisoner movements within a prison or jail. It was designed to employ computer-based methods of tracking inmates to improve the efficiency of corrections specialists and brig officials and to demonstrate how advanced technology can make corrections facilities safer.”
“The company announced Aug. 24 that it has made the first sale of its infant protection, wander prevention and staff duress system to the Brampton Civic Hospital in Brampton, Ontario. Separately, the company confirmed a day earlier that it is in talks with the military to test its implantable chips in two branches of the military.
But VeriChip also has a separate patient identification system, VeriMed, which is used beneath the skin. Once the chip is implanted in the fatty part of a persons arm (or in the hand(!!!), as chip volunteers have done), it displays a 16-digit identifier when tapped by an RFID reader. The number accesses health information in a database that requires a username and password for admittance.”
“Alzheimer’s Community Care Facility, in West Palm Beach Florida, intends to begin implanting radio frequency identification chips, RFID, in Alzheimer patients, despite the outcry of violation of privacy.
She believes the RFID chip, manufactured by VeriChip Corp, provides a valuable service that allows medical facilities to quickly and easily access medical information the patient often is not able to provide on their own.”
Applied Digital Solutions of Palm Beach, Fla., is hoping that Americans can be persuaded to implant RFID chips under their skin to identify themselves when going to a cash machine or in place of using a credit card.
RFID tags are miniscule microchips, which some manufacturers have managed to shrink to half the size of a grain of sand. They listen for a radio query and respond by transmitting a unique ID code, typically a 64-bit identifier yielding about 18 thousand trillion possible values.
BBC Science producer Simon Morton goes clubbing in Barcelona with a microchip implanted in his arm to pay for drinks.
Implanting microchips that emit a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) into animals has been common practice in many countries around the world, with some looking to make it a legal requirement for domestic pet owners.
A press release issued by the Chinese government today announced the countrywide implementation of a new high-tech tracking initiative designed to “increase security and prosperity for all citizens of the People’s Republic of China.”
There seems to be a definite trend towards giving every person a unique, digital identifier. Now, what happens if you have to have a certain, SPECIFIC identifier to use ANY services or facilities? What if you have to agree to have an RFID with someone elses ID, say perhaps, one that associates you with a certain charismatic leader? Not so easy to discount now, is it?